North Staffordshire Local Medical Committee

Home
Up
Latest News
Subject Index
Archive
New Contract
PBC
Interesting Facts
Documents
Emis Documents
Membership
Meeting Calendar
Links
Contact Us

 

Newsletters Index

Newsletter March 2002

Editorial

New Contract

Supplementary Lists

Appraisal for GP principals in England

Disability Discrimination Act

Hepatitis B Vaccine

OFSTED - Childminder forms

NHS Performance indicators.

MTRAC

Donna Louise Trust

Muscle Tone Sessions.

Health at Work in Primary Care

Editorial

The 1st April comes ever closer and yet another major change in the organisation of the Health Service. Yet again rushed in, this time rushed in without the legislation in place to deliver the service in the intended way. Legislation to pass more powers to the Primary Care Trusts and for the formation of Strategic Health Authorities will not be in place until later in the year. Until then, Health Authorities and PCTs have had to devise methods to allow themselves to work in the intended way. Change to the organisation, inevitably brings with it the loss of some of the personnel and expertise which has been built up over the preceding years and this, of course, may lead to problems for those working in the service. Please let the committee know of any problems practices have following this re-organisation.

Top of the Document

New Contract

The GPC has now completed the first stage of its negotiations over a New Contract for General Practice. Some of the details about this have already appeared in the medical press. LMC officers have been invited to a meeting in London on 19th April to receive more details of the “New Contract”. The GPC will then be holding meetings throughout the country to which all GPs will be invited. The nearest ones locally are likely to be in Birmingham, Manchester and Chester. The LMC has arranged with Bernie Shevlin to make a presentation and receive feedback on this issue at a lunchtime meeting at Britannia Stadium on 30th April. We hope to be able to circulate more details after the 19th April meeting, although no doubt these will also appear in the press.

Top of the Document

Supplementary Lists

Regulations came into effect on 14 December 2002 that introduce new powers to health authorities in the way they manage lists of GPs. The main changes include:

From April 1 2002 the introduction of supplementary lists for non- principal GPs

Changes to existing medical lists to include an expanded application process requiring detail about e.g. the GPs previous career, and any criminal record and past NHS fraud investigations

Please note that 31st March 2002 is the last date for receipt of applications from non-principals currently working, who want to work immediately post 1 April 2002, when the lists come into effect. Applications can be made at any time after 31st March. However, the transitional arrangements, allowing those not on the supplementary list, to continue to work while their application is being processed, will not apply to applications received after this date.

The GPC does not agree with the detail of execution of this act which, they believe, leaves important human rights issues unaddressed. It is unfortunate therefore that the Health Department chose to impose these regulations without further consideration of these issues.

GP registrars - note that GP registrars need to be on the supplementary list to continue to work in the same way as non-principals. The rationale of the Health Department is that this is because of the direct patient contact. If GP registrars are undergoing approved training they can be admitted to the list. If that training is successfully completed they will stay on the list if they wish. If the training is not completed successfully then the GP registrar will be asked to voluntarily withdraw from the list. The above timetable will apply. The GPC is currently in discussion with the Department about this issue and further guidance will be issued in due course.

Please note that as from 1st April GMS principals cannot employ another doctor unless he/she is on the supplementary list and there is an obligation to check this detail. There is also an obligation to check references before employment. The Health Authority will also be seeking references for applicants to the supplementary lists. In respect of this is it important to be objective in the giving of a reference. A "clinical reference" is actually a report on someone's clinical performance it is a serious matter and if not done properly can bring your own registration into question. The GMC booklet on “Good Medical Practice” states:

You must be honest and objective when appraising or assessing the performance of any doctor including those you have supervised or trained. Patients may be put at risk if you describe as competent someone who has not reached or maintained a satisfactory standard of practice.

You must provide only honest and justifiable comments when giving references for, or writing reports about, colleagues. When providing references you must include all relevant information which has any bearing on your colleague's competence, performance, and conduct.

Further advice about the introduction of Supplementary lists can be found on the GPC website.

Top of the Document

Appraisal for GP principals in England

Following a long process of negotiation between the GPC negotiating team and the English Department of Health, the GPC has voted in favour of accepting the Department's proposals on GP appraisal.
In summary, the Department has agreed that PCTs must support the appraisal process if it is to be implemented. Such support includes funded protected time while GPs prepare for and undertake appraisal, as well as any remedial training identified by appraisal. Safeguards will be in place to ensure such support is provided.
PCTs must consult LMCs on the support and funding to be provided, and LMCs will play a vital role in monitoring this.
Appraisal will be introduced in April 2002 for GP principals, and their PMS equivalents, in England. The GPC has written to all GPs regarding this.
Negotiations on appraisal for non-principals, and GPs in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are ongoing.

Appraisals should occur during normal hours, and GPs should be reimbursed for providing locums or covering for a colleague if no locum can be found. The wording of the change to our Terms of Service is such that legal opinion has concluded that if the local appraisal scheme does not comply with these requirements, there will be no requirement for a GP to participate in appraisal.

Top of the Document

Disability Discrimination Act

PCOs have now received the reports they commissioned on GP premises. The requirement under the act is for practice to implement changes that can be “reasonably” carried out. A lot of the suggested requirements are clearly “pie in the sky” and unaffordable. Practice should look at other less expensive procedures, guidelines and ways of achieving a similar objective.

Top of the Document

Hepatitis B Vaccine

Requests for the administration of this vaccine often cause confusion has to whether it is or is not appropriate and whether or not it should be carried out by the patient’s occupational health service. Margaret Jones, in her role as Medical Advisor to the Health Authority has drawn up some practical advice on this which gives a sensible viewpoint on this difficult issue. A copy of this is being circulated to practices. A copy is also available on the LMC website at: www.staffslmcs.freeserve.co.uk

I have recently written to Combined Healthcare about Hepatitis B immunisation for new employees. They do recognise that the responsibility for immunisation lies with themselves, although they were suggesting members of staff should contact their GP if they wished the immunisation to be given at their own surgery.

Staffordshire Police have also agreed that they should take responsibility for immunising new recruits to the force. This was agreed by their Health & Safety Committee in December after a considerable amount of correspondence with them by both North and South Staffs LMCs.

Top of the Document

OFSTED - Childminder forms

From September 2001 responsibility for the regulation of childminding and day care for children under eight transferred from local authorities to the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED), who have been undertaking registration since July.
OFSTED consulted the BMA about the approach they should adopt and the content of the forms. As part of the process of checking upon suitability, OFSTED will be checking the mental and physical fitness of the childminders, their assistants and persons in charge of day care provisions. In order to do this, OFSTED will be asking these people to fill in a health self-declaration and consent to a medical report being sought from their GP. This will be sent to the GP with a request for a brief factual medical report, which is a straightforward report from records. OFSTED will be requesting these checks on behalf of the relevant individuals as the regulator, not as their employer. As childminders are self employed and persons in charge of day care groups are either employed by the owners or are the owners, the fee payable to the GP will be met by the individual or employer and OFSTED will seek consent from the individual on that basis.
The BMA professional fees committee considered that a fee of £44 would be reasonable for this purpose and this has been published in the relevant BMA fee guidance schedule as agreed with OFSTED. It would appear, however, that it is not clear in the correspondence GPs receive from OFSTED that the childminder is aware and has accepted that he/she will be liable for the fee. The GPC has asked OFSTED if they will in future include this statement in their correspondence with doctors. OFSTED have recruited medical practitioners to offer advice on the medical reports received from GPs. They will access the medical information received and advise, on a risk assessment basis, on the person's suitability for the proposed role. The reports do not require GPs to provide anything other than facts from the patient's notes, although the GPC has pointed out to OFSTED that patients may not be aware that where the medical adviser deems it necessary to request a copy of the patient's notes there will be an additional cost of up to £50. The GPC has written to OFSTED clarifying this and has requested that information on this be included on the form completed by the patient.

Top of the Document

NHS Performance indicators.

The DOH has recently issued a further set of NHS performance indicators. These show that North Staffordshire has one of the lowest number of GPs per 100,000 population in the country, 49 compared to an average of 57.4. This is the 10th lowest in the country. This leaves us 40 GPs short of average and 95 GPs short compared to North Yorkshire. Yet despite this we have delivered very well on childhood immunisation (95.2% aver 90.9% 7th best) and flu vaccination (73.6%, aver 65.5% 4th highest). We are also above average with cervical cytology screening rates.  Interestingly despite having a high morbidity in the area, emergency admission rates are only just above average.

Top of the Document 

MTRAC

A vacancy exists on this important committee whose aim is to:

provide a review system to identify the clinical value, safety and suitability for use of pharmaceutical products in primary care and to enable and encourage their optimum introduction in the West Midlands Region, including proposed transfers and requests from secondary care. Meetings are held monthly usually on the fourth Thursday at Birmingham Medical Institute from 12.30 – 15.00.

Top of the Document

Donna Louise Trust

(Article by Dr Gordon Carpenter)

The Donna Louise Trust is, as many of you know, a local charity with the aim of providing a Hospice for children with life limiting illnesses which will be built in the near future on the Trentham Lakes site. It will also provide support for these children in their own homes, and to that end, I am pleased to say that we have now acquired funding for the Community Nurse Team and they are in place. Already we have had referrals to this nursing team for several children with severe life limiting illnesses but we are sure there are other children out there who would benefit from the service. If any of our colleagues has a family who they think may benefit from this sort of support, then please contact the Head of Care, Margaret Harvey at c/o Lovatt Engineering, Bournes Bank, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 3DW. Tel: 01782 811911.

Top of the Document

Muscle Tone Sessions.

GPs are increasingly being approached to sign forms for patients who wish to take various forms of exercise. Among these are the muscle tone sessions which are held at Dimensions and Shelton Pool. These were established years ago in partnership with physiotherapists from the Haywood hospital. The sessions are specifically for people recovering from injuries, ailments such as arthritis and obesity who would benefit from the therapeutic benefits of hydrotherapy. These sessions have always been restricted to people referred by a GP. However, patients appear to self refer to these sessions and then present their GP with a form to sign to allow them to undertake these sessions. The reason for the form is not clearly explained either to patient or doctor. I have written to the City Council suggesting that this is no doubt an example of unnecessary paperwork for GPs. If the sessions are held under the supervision of a trained physiotherapist, they should be capable of assessing the risks involved and this “referral” process puts unnecessary obstacles in the way.

Top of the Document

Health at Work in Primary Care

The Health Development Agency has produced two publications addressing issues of workplace health in GP practices.

  1. Workplace health environmental audit report: A guide to tools appropriate for primary health care facilities. This report has been produced in response to the need for accurate, up-to-date information about environmental audit tools appropriate for general practice.
  2. Workplace health in rural practices: Issues for GPs and their staff. This publication focuses on workplace health issues experienced by GPs and their staff in rural England. It aims to highlight issues of concern, share examples of good practice and put forward recommendations for the future support of rural practices.

Copies of these documents can be obtained by email to Vivienne.rangecroft@had-online.org.uk. The document is also available on their website at www.hda-online.org.uk/

DR P GOLIK (Secretary)

Top of the Document